An Austin man has made the news as
far away as England with his self-made website defining what type of girl he
would like. Maybe he heard about Dr. Chen’s matchmaking efforts. The self-styled rocker offers a list even
longer than the good doctor’s including a refusal to date women with kids or
plans to have kids, wears glasses, smokes, or doesn’t dress conservatively. I
read his requirements and initially thought he was picky. Judge for yourself, here’s the link.
I disliked the part where he
lumped all women engaged in online dating as unacceptable. His view was if they were something special,
they could meet men the regular way. I am assuming the normal way must be
designing your own website and offering to drop a thousand or two for someone
who will scare you up a date for money.
It is easy to make fun of this man
who late one night came up with an idea to advertise for a companion. Still,
isn’t that what everyone does, from the woman who dons a minuscule black dress
to go clubbing to the engineer who carefully words his online profile? I think
the real problem here is compromise.
Recently, I had a fortuneteller tell me I would always be disappointed in men since I had an
idealized view of romance. She must have told all her female clients this and
they readily agreed. It may be true for most, not for me though since I have a
practical view, which involves some compromise. Many women want a bad boy to
wow her, while a stable boyfriend sees her through her daily struggles. It is
similar to a man looking for the Madonna and a whore in one woman.
Our hopeful Romeo in Austin didn’t
have any worse attitude than many. His mistake was writing it down and
publishing it online. Anyone who has ever completed a dating profile knows
there is a section you can check for race, age, religion, and body type. Many
men and women manage to work in specifics about height, hair, and eye color
too.
The personality traits we try to
discover through premade questions require a month of emails to decide if someone
is datable. What is the big difference between the guy in Austin and every
other man out there dating?
There’s a feeling that he isn’t
willing to compromise on anything. He wants what he wants, rather like a five
year old. What he really wants is a clone of his old girlfriend who dumped him
after eleven years of always being there.
I believe everyone has an
idealized image of the perfect date/mate. Most don’t bear any resemblance to
people living or dead. When you actually get down to dating, you have to decide
what you can’t tolerate. What is the deal breaker or is there one to begin with?
Going back to our friend in
Austin, he decided he didn’t want a smoker after dating one for eleven years.
Of course, the initial response is why did he date one for eleven years? She
must have had other traits that outweighed the smoking.
This is compromise. You decide if
the good outweighs the non-existent. Notice I didn’t say bad. A guy who shows
up with flowers once a month can never outweigh being a raging alcoholic.
Still, a thoughtful man who opens your car door trumps any six-foot man who
rushed to the car to get in first as if calling shotgun.
Relationships often end because
people do not understand the need to compromise. Often people want desperately
to be a couple, yet want all aspects of their life to remain the same. There is no compromise involved. To create
good relationships and even find a date, there needs to be some concept of
compromise.
Women tend to date with the future
in mind while men date in the present. What this means is women will look at a
man and decide if there is a future with him. Men will look at a woman as all
right for now. The problem with both of these outlooks is it is still about one
individual as opposed to the two involved.
In arranged marriages, often the
family will advertise for a mate. Half the page is devoted to the traits they
want, the other part is what the potential spouse will bring. Most hopeful
daters forget this part. What are you bringing to the table?
I noticed the Sleepless in Austin website went on endlessly with I want messages. He also told you dozens
of things he liked and didn’t like. It was all about him. A woman could piece
together that he’d be opinionated, demanding, willing to date endlessly with no
commitment.
He wasn’t able to see he was not
the same person who dated his original girlfriend those fifteen years ago. The
search for the ideal woman is going into its fourth year. He shouldn’t expect
the same type of girl because he’s changed. Some of those changes may have sent
his original girlfriend on her way.
He needs to compromise his
standards somewhat. While I admire a healthy self-confidence, often it isn’t
merited. The compromise line is a tricky one to walk. You give too much, then,
you’re resentful. If your partner feels you don’t give enough, then often he or
she will use this as an excuse to leave. It is a shifting measure too.
Sometimes your partner gives more. Other times you do. There can be no real
relationship without compromise.
A lesson Sleepless in Austin might do well to learn, but others who are
hoping to make a love connection would benefit from it too.