A recent
article about Tinder.com on The
Huffington Post had me re-evaluating the state of dating in the US. For those
who haven’t heard, Tinder is a dating app. It features a photo or photos with a
500-character description, which is the equivalent of three plus tweets. The
person viewing your picture places an X on it if she doesn’t like the profile or
a heart if she does. Instant notification happens when someone you hearted has
hearted you.
The article, written by dating
coach David Wygant, explains he developed a profile to try the app out. He
considered himself a decent looking man and appealing to the opposite sex.
Wygant hearted several local women. Some older than him and others he deemed as
attractive as him. There were those he believed would check him out in a public
setting and even younger women who preferred older men. He got exactly zero
hearts back. After heart-ing dozens of women, Wygant received no likes on his
own photo. What was the deal?
He wasn’t looking at models or
actresses, but ordinary women. However, each woman rebuffed him. The earnest male has just entered the world
of women. No matter how smart or funny
women are, the hip to waist ratio ends up as the measuring stick.
The ironic thing about this
article was that women might be applying the same extreme standard of
attractiveness that they’ve complained
about men using. Here’s a handsome man
who knows how to write a good description because he’s a dating coach, but he
gets nada. It also gives him a feel for what his clients are experiencing too.
Then there’s the possibility that
he was too good-looking or too smooth in his description. There are plenty of
posers with attractive photos whose only goal is to separate a woman from her
money. The woman in question could have dismissed him as not real.
Meeting someone you’ve never met
and know nothing about takes courage or stupidity; it depends on whom you talk
to. Women as a whole want to know more about the man than the tiny Tinder
profile allows. The meeting is for the exchange of information, but it looks
like very few people ever make it to the actual meet.
Then again, the dating coach
isn’t exactly anonymous. Maybe a few women googled the picture and wondered if
they’d be part of the next article or lesson. Inadvertently, they actually were.
Wygant could have checked the
article on Global
Grind about why women swipe your
photo to the left to figure out if he was guilty of any the dating app
stumbles.
He finally ends the article with
a comment about Tinder being something for people in their twenties. Maybe it
is. Still, it cuts out much of the initial flirtation, the meeting of the eyes,
the shy smiles, casual hellos that mean something more. This is all lost in a
fast food approach to dating. A woman might pass on a man whose smile isn’t
wide enough or his eyebrows need grooming.
Your Tango gave three women’s POV
in another blog.
Two weren’t that interested since they had heard men used the app only for sex.
The third woman discussed going on about a dozen dates that never developed
into anything.
Going back to our dating coach,
you have to wonder if the women he hearted just felt they were a booty call.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete